Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
About Varied / Hobbyist Premium Member semi-surreal46/Male/United States Recent Activity
Deviant for 2 Years
9 Month Premium Membership
Statistics 12 Deviations 2,064 Comments 8,488 Pageviews


Newest Deviations

What's most important to you as an artist (other than selling your artworks or being commissioned)? 

55 deviants said Having viewers thoughtfully and thoroughly COMMENT on my work (or my page in general).
15 deviants said NETWORKING (making friends and/or business contacts).
12 deviants said Having viewers WATCH (formally subscribe to) my page.
11 deviants said Having viewers FAVOURITE my work.
7 deviants said Having viewers formally CRITIQUE (and rate) my work.
3 deviants said Having viewers FEATURE my work (other than in their Favourites).
1 deviant said Receiving a token GIFT (any of various badges, or relatively few points).

       I’m amused by scientists who claim that someday a meteorite will destroy the earth; I just can’t imagine an outer-space rock causing destruction on a planetary scale...something has always seemed to me to be missing from their equation.


       So, I’ve developed the concept of Molecular Kinetic Synergy to account for that elusive factor.  Simply explained, it means that the greater the size of the object impacted – in absolute (total), not relative, dimensions – the greater its potential to synergistically “absorb” the force.  In other words, scientists conducting an experiment in their laboratory using, let’s say, a billiards ball propelled against a globe composed of earthly materials (dirt, rocks, sand, water, lava/liquid metal) would not derive analogous results as would be observed if a proportionately-sized meteorite were to hit us.


       The reasons are two-fold: First, regardless of how well-calibrated and life-like the experiment (with its proportioned masses, densities, forces), a laboratory globe does not consist of as many molecules – as a total quantity – as our actual planet consists of.  Secondly, nor would any globe have anywhere near the immense gravity of earth, itself, to moderate the reaction of the impact.


       Considering that the size of a given molecule is a "constant", the greater the total number of molecules present, the more "absorbant" the target becomes.  That same principle determines if a couch, for example, is perceived as "soft" or as "rigid": the more comfortable ones have more cushion (molecules) conforming to your shape – thus providing more surface area to sustain your weight.


       Thusly, a real asteroid colliding with earth would be analogous to your propelling yourself onto a couch with "memory foam", instead of onto a relatively "course" (in effect) bean-bag.  Likewise, the dynamics of meteorite collisions onto planets are qualitatively – and not just quantitatively (as in "proportionately") different from experiments performed in a lab.


       Furthermore, to any objections concerning the “insignificance” of a lowly molecule…let us not forget, ironically, that almost all falling rocks are amazingly vaporized by the very atmosphere of earth – with its significantly less potential Molecular Kinetic Synergy than our oceans or land obviously have! 


       In conclusion, we mustn’t worry about "needing to defend” our planet from meteorites; the astronomical quantity of molecules that it consists of (together with its natural gravity at work) will suffice to “cushion” us from the unduly-imagined catastrophe that, until now, we thought would be our fate.  The odds are scarier that nuclear war, super viruses, and/or unprecedented solar flares on a cosmically grand scale will exterminate us all before any falling rock has a chance to.  Can you dig it?


  • Mood: Wow!
  • Listening to: Turn The Page by Metallica
  • Reading: software textbook (Windows 7)
  • Watching: the weather segment (news)
  • Playing: chess - drew StockFish, wow!
  • Eating: saganaki (flaming cheese)
  • Drinking: cherry Coke



Artist | Hobbyist | Varied
United States
That's me in my avatar, at 2 years old. I also have another version of it within my Scraps gallery. One of the two originals [1970 passport photos, from Greece] seems to have developed a natural sepia-tone -- which lets you know how ancient I am!


semi-surreal has started a donation pool!
92 / 4,792
You will get GOOD KARMA if you donate points! That's the best deal life could offer you.

All donations will go to our fellow deserving deviants (not to me).

Thanks for your generosity.

You must be logged in to donate.
  • :iconpaintedmagic:
    Donated Jul 3, 2014, 7:29:56 AM
  • :iconstarblazerin:
    Donated Nov 2, 2013, 1:06:08 AM
  • :iconfarand:
    Donated Oct 23, 2013, 2:16:49 AM
  • :iconfarand:
    Donated May 21, 2013, 11:59:38 AM
  • :iconcreyk:
    Donated Sep 12, 2012, 12:50:38 PM
  • :iconjenniferweiler:
    Donated Jul 15, 2012, 9:48:26 PM


Add a Comment:
Flagged as Spam
Flagged as Spam
Hidden by Owner
Hidden by Commenter
Flagged as Spam
Hidden by Owner
Hidden by Commenter
Hidden by Owner
Hidden by Owner
Hidden by Owner
Hidden by Commenter
bohobella Featured By Owner Jun 27, 2014  Professional Traditional Artist
randomly online and thought i'd say hi :iconjuap:
semi-surreal Featured By Owner Jun 27, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Welcome back after all these years!

How did you remember your dA password, was it on a sticky-note under your keyboard?
Hidden by Owner
Hidden by Commenter
Hidden by Owner
Hidden by Owner
Hidden by Owner
Cassy007 Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
thx for the Llama meowmeowmeow meowpatmeow meowpokemeow APH: onion austria England (Laughing) [V3] 
Hidden by Owner
Hidden by Owner
Hidden by Owner
farand Featured By Owner Mar 21, 2014
Flagged as Spam
Hidden by Owner
Add a Comment: